| Back : 12 months | 6 months | 3 months | 1 month | Lay : 12 months | 6 months | 3 months | 1 month | |
| Comparison : Top 10 | Ex-Proofing | Archive : 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Information from Lay Today about their service
Lay Today
Lay Today no longer proof selections to Racing-Index.
Switch to show Figures based on Advised Stakes
Proofed Results for Lay Today Lay Selections
Month by Month Breakdown of Proofed Results Based on 1 Point Level Stakes
| Month | Bets | SR% | Staked | Profit | |
| September 2010 | 15 | 60.0 | 15.00 | -4.18 | |
| August 2010 | 94 | 83.0 | 94.00 | 0.89 | |
| July 2010 | 74 | 79.7 | 74.00 | -0.50 | |
| June 2010 | 102 | 78.4 | 102.00 | -1.96 | |
| May 2010 | 138 | 73.2 | 138.00 | -13.59 | |
| April 2010 | 95 | 87.4 | 95.00 | 7.22 | |
| March 2010 | 90 | 77.8 | 90.00 | -2.80 | |
| February 2010 | 33 | 84.8 | 33.00 | 1.27 | |
| January 2010 | 59 | 81.4 | 59.00 | 1.24 | |
| Total for 2010 | 700 | 79.4 | 700.0 | -12.41 | |
| Month | Bets | SR% | Staked | Profit | |
| December 2009 | 79 | 83.5 | 79.00 | 3.05 | |
| November 2009 | 87 | 71.3 | 87.00 | -10.12 | |
| October 2009 | 117 | 76.1 | 117.00 | -7.83 | |
| September 2009 | 118 | 79.7 | 118.00 | -1.52 | |
| August 2009 | 143 | 78.3 | 143.00 | -4.05 | |
| July 2009 | 128 | 77.3 | 128.00 | -5.18 | |
| June 2009 | 122 | 82.0 | 122.00 | 2.78 | |
| Total for 2009 | 794 | 78.3 | 794.0 | -22.87 | |
Bets = Number of selections provided
SR% = Percentage Success Rate. i.e. number of profitable selections / number of selections
Staked = Total amount risked on selections, based on amounts entered by the tipster (e.g. a 10 point bet placed at odds of 4/1 would be a stake of 40 points as that is the amount you'd lose if the selection won the race).
Profit = Total points profit/loss. For 2008 onwards Betfair Starting Prices are used. For years prior to that, odds of 15% above SP are used. The figures assume a commission rate of 5% on all winning bets. This is an upper amount and will reduce the more bets you place with Betfair. You can see the effect of varying the assumed commission % by looking at the Full Proofed Results (see link above).
